Wednesday, December 22, 2010
cloudy lunar eclipse
Saturday, December 4, 2010
First Snow of Winter
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Doonesbury Astronomy
I enjoy the tension in Garry Trudeau's work Doonesbury.
with my students. They were able to find the mistake.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Eastern Standard Time
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Sharing the Moon
Greensboro has a nice new park downtown, and the site has become a magnet for folks and events. I took my 6 inch Celestron telescope to the park today for a couple of hours.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Where do we learn?
Last week a tragedy happened. A young college student was recorded without his consent and the activity was broadcast on the Internet, to his embarrassment.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Galaxy
Sunday, September 19, 2010
The Tempest in the sky
Observing the Moon
Friday, July 2, 2010
Three Planets plus at the Observatory
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Senses
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Lost in Space
This past Friday evening, Dr. Steve Danford (UUC-G) addressed the Greensboro Astronomy Club regarding the future of America's space program. Steve's always a good presenter, and he can even make sense out of the chaos we call NASA.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Turtle in the Road
Coming home from shopping today we encountered a big and dirty Eastern Painted Turtle in our street.
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Beauty of Saturn
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Dr. Doolittle
I've been working at the Natural Science Center of Greensboro for almost six years, now. It's been a great experience, and I really enjoy working with the animals.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
65 is sick
About 16 years ago, Barbara brought home a little kitten found at the pound. I really wasn't interested in having a cat, but she was a beautiful kitten.
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Universal Truths
1. I think part of a best friend's job should be to immediately clear your computer history if you die.
2. Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you're wrong.
3. I totally take back all those times I didn't want to nap when I was younger.
4. There is great need for a sarcasm font.
5. How in the world are you supposed to fold a fitted sheet?
6. Was learning cursive really necessary?
7. Map Quest really needs to start their directions on #5. I'm pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
8. Obituaries would be a lot more interesting if they told you how the person died.
9. I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind of tired.
10. Bad decisions make good stories.
11. You never know when it will strike, but there comes a moment at work when you know that you just aren't going to do anything productive for the rest of the day.
12. Can we all just agree to ignore whatever comes after Blue Ray? I don't want to have to restart my collection...again.
13. I'm always slightly terrified when I exit out of Word and it asks me if I want to save any changes to my ten-page research paper that I swear I did not make any changes to.
14. "Do not machine wash or tumble dry" means I will never wash this - ever.
15. I hate when I just miss a call by the last ring (Hello? Hello?), but when I immediately call back, it rings nine times and goes to voice mail. What did you do after I didn't answer? Drop the phone and run away?
16. I hate leaving my house confident and looking good and then not seeing anyone of importance the entire day. What a waste.
17. I keep some people's phone numbers in my phone just so I know not to answer when they call.
18. I think the freezer deserves a light as well.
19. I disagree with Kay Jewelers. I would bet on any given Friday or Saturday night more kisses begin with Miller Lite than Kay.
20. I wish Google Maps had an "Avoid Ghetto" routing option.
21. Sometimes, I'll watch a movie that I watched when I was younger and suddenly realize I had no idea what the heck was going on when I first saw it.
22. I would rather try to carry 10 plastic grocery bags in each hand than take 2 trips to bring my groceries in.
23. The only time I look forward to a red light is when I'm trying to finish a text.
24. I have a hard time deciphering the fine line between boredom and hunger.
25. How many times is it appropriate to say "What?" before you just nod and smile because you still didn't hear or understand a word they said?
26. I love the sense of camaraderie when an entire line of cars team up to prevent an idiot from cutting in at the front. Stay strong, brothers and sisters!
27. Shirts get dirty. Underwear gets dirty. Pants? Pants never get dirty, and you can wear them forever.
28. Is it just me or do high school kids get dumber & dumber every year?
29. There's no worse feeling than that millisecond you're sure you are going to die after leaning your chair back a little too far.
30. As a driver I hate pedestrians, and as a pedestrian I hate drivers, but no matter what the mode of transportation, I always hate cyclists.
31. Sometimes I'll look down at my watch 3 consecutive times and still not know what time it is.
32. Even under ideal conditions people have trouble locating their car keys in a pocket, finding their cell phone, and Pinning the Tail on the Donkey, but I'd bet my behind everyone can find and push the snooze button from 3 feet away, in about 1.7 seconds, eyes closed, first time, every time!
Monday, April 12, 2010
Archeology in South Africa
The Cradle of Humankind
During our 2004 visit, the work area at the archeological dig in South Africa was full of workers and fossils. Workers were carefully cleaning the finds and the organizing them for further study.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Astralopithecus sediba
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Planets at the Observatory
Thursday, April 1, 2010
True Story
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Do you believe in scientific evidence?
#
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
The beginning of Spring
Astronomically, Spring usually begins around March 21.
The Earth is tilted on its axis, relative to the plane of its orbit around the Sun. Sometimes our northern hemisphere is tilted toward the Sun (that's our summer) and sometimes we're leaning away from the Sun (our winter.)
In between, we find Spring and Fall.
So around March 21, the Sun reaches the celestial equator on it's slow slide higher in the sky. That's the official beginning of Spring, the Vernal Equinox.
But this week I got to attend my first Spring Training games of the baseball season. While we focused on the Cardinals and Mets, we got to see other teams, too.
Monday: Mets 11, Marlins 2
Tuesday: Astros 8, Mets 4
Wednesday: Nationals 4, Cards 6
Friday: Red Sox v. Cards Rainout
The image at the top is rainy Roger Dean Stadium, Jupiter, Florida, March 12, 2010.
("Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains. Think about that for a while." Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh in the movie "Bull Durham")
So for me and Barbara, experiencing game-time temperatures in the 70's, our Spring began this week.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Friendly Stargazing
The go-to is so decadent. I use to have to know where I wanted to look in the sky as well as what I wanted to look at. Now, with go-to, I only need to know what I want to observe. A friend with binoculars was tenacious about find the same objects. Of course she used my 'scope as a clue, but she sometimes had to really search the sky. Is that a skill that will be lost with go-to-capability? Will it matter?
My scope also tells a little information about the selected celestial objects. At the beginning of the evening I would read and paraphrase what the computer said for my friends standing around. Would you tell them that you're reading from the computer or let them continue to think think you're that knowledgeable? When does it become deception?
We had a great time with a near-first-quarter moon, M42, Mars and Saturn, lots of questions, lots of friends plus much more.
Some of my favorite questions at this star party:
1. Do I believe in aliens?
2. Can stars change over time?
3. Why did NASA secretly crash a probe onto the far side of the Moon to look for water?
Making a Comet in Class
Thursday in astronomy class we made a "comet" using dry ice, water, sand, cola and glass cleaner.
Unbeknownst to me one of my students made a video of the experience and put it on YouTube at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1veYdeDxdJE
If I'd known, I would have had the photographer closer with his camera and microphone.
Friday, February 19, 2010
It Really Is a Small World, After all
We could move closer or further from the many different branches of our family trees. It would be an adventure.
We decided that one of the great things about living in the same community for a long time, is you get to run into people you know. So we stayed.
Yesterday at the Science Center where I teach all manner of science to elementary school kids, I ran into two former students from the early 90's. One is now a teacher, and the other was chaperoning with her son's class. It was wonderful catching up with our stories, and that I really enjoy. Leia is a teacher of special education. Both the teacher and the mom were students in my 9th grade economics class.
That was great. Along with sharing science with the kids, I was seeing two of my former students in their roles as mom and teacher.
Then in the grocery store that afternoon, there was a former colleague and her mother shopping. Angie is now a grandmother and is being a great help to her aging mother. That was great, too.
We get to run into people we know.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Sceintific Inquiry and Nature of Science in my classroom
Goals might be:
1. To improve scientific literacy of students
2. Help students discover the value in using scientific inquiry to construct their own knowledge
3. Create opportunities for students to develop positive attitudes toward science
4. Improve the students’ views of the scientific endeavor
5. Improve the learners’ views of NOS
6. Lead students to value the importance of learning about NOS
7. Students understand the source and limits of scientific knowledge
Overall:
1. I would cover fewer concept topics and plan for more discussions about NOS and Scientific Inquiry .
2. I would be explicit in our class expectations of student understandings of NOS and Scientific Inquiry.
3. I would communicate to students the importance of learning about NOS by assessing it after instruction.
4. I would strive to be flexible and not distort these guides into a fixed set of sequences and steps to follow each and every situation.
In class I would:
1. Have students complete a lab or activity first
2. Lead students in reflection on what they did procedurally, why they did it, and what implications this has
a. Discuss the distinction between observation and inference,
b. Discuss the difference between scientific laws and theories,
c. Consider how imagination and creativity were important,
d. Note examples of the tentative nature of scientific knowledge,
e. Be aware of cultural and societal influences on science and scientists,
f. Consider the credibility of several explanations,
g. Remember that scientific knowledge is never absolute.
3. Remind students that the completed activity, while not exactly “real world” science, it’s a reasonable facsimile.
Shouldn’t we consider NOS and Scientific Inquiry important in both domains, cognitive and affective? Will the improved scientific literacy of our students make a difference if the students only receive them, but do not incorporate them as part of their characterization of themselves as students of science?
For example, it's been pointed out that the “arguments against the validity of evolution” include the challenge of testing. Scientific testing seems to be a very cognitive activity. Perhaps those anti-evolution arguments are more in the affective domain?
In the British periodical “Philosophy Now” there is a regular article called “Dear Socrates” in which a modern day writer responds to a question speaking as Socrates. In the September/October 2009 issue, “Socrates” writes that
"it is not so much our being related to animals that so riles the religionists as that this relation infringes on our presumed prerogative to use them [animals] as we will. The former “insults” us as being “mere” animals but the latter inconveniences us which is even more intolerable!"
To me, “Socrates’s” view of the anti-evolution argument is based more in the affective domain rather than in the cognitive. Could much of the anti-evolution, anti-science movement be based in the affective domain?
Helping students hold “positive views” of science means much more than having students parrot back the reasons science is right. Do we want students to act consistently according to NOS values they have internalized?
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Is Experience the best teacher?
Among other failures, it appears that we are not encouraging students to address their preconceptions nor are we nurturing the habit of thinking about thinking. My astronomy students just finished the “Reason for the Seasons” lab in which they first gave voice to their preconceptions, used measurements and reasoning to analyze the observations, and then revisited possible misconceptions.
Surprisingly, a significant number of my students accurately measured the apparent size of the Sun, organized the data, drew a graphic representation of the Earth’s orbit and still insisted that the Earth is closer to the Sun in the summer. We’ll need a slogan that embraces this reluctance to see the obvious.
Some of my students also wanted to know if their written descriptions of the observations were “right or wrong.” It appears that even in a university introductory astronomy course, we need to consider the pacing of student development of ideas about scientific knowledge. Let’s look for a slogan that reflects this experimental nature of science that’s so difficult for students to comprehend.
In TV shows such as CSI and MythBusters we see forensic experts and scientists solve mysteries using their qualitative understanding of nature. But not all of us are trying to solve mysteries. Many are just trying to survive day-to-day. Do members of the public really need a “qualitative understanding” of every concept? Maybe just knowing the right answers, the facts, the “quantitative relation” of scientific concepts, is enough for some people. Let’s find a slogan that embodies the mystery while acknowledging the mundane.
Students tend to think the purpose of controlled science experiments is to look for evidence that is consistent with their prior beliefs. While I’m not sure that’s a universally bad thing to do, we don’t really need to look far to find that same weakness in the practicing scientific community. Practicing scientists are also human too, and have all the strengths and weaknesses of that condition. We need a slogan that encapsulates this human tendency to see what we want to see.
Scientific Inquiry helps learners develop skills in collecting and analyzing evidence. It also encourages learners to address preconceptions. In addition, Scientific Inquiry guides the learners in think about thinking. A catchy slogan we might want to consider should probably address this multifaceted nature of Scientific Inquiry.
There are many ways to design a science course. Some teachers will need time and encouragement to learn more about Scientific Inquiry and think about science using this different approach.
Many children and adults assume that things are the way they appear and “science is about questioning the obvious.” Maybe we can get our slogan from a modern day version of a 19th century CSI. For Scientific Inquiry’s slogan I propose this phrase from the 2009 film “Sherlock Holmes” with Robert Downy Jr.:
“There’s nothing more elusive than an obvious fact.”
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Science as Story Telling
from "Skeptics and True Believers" (1998) by Chet Raymo
This week I was reminded of Chet Raymo’s description of scientific knowledge as an island that we “dike and fill.” But occasionally that island is overwhelmed by a tidal wave of a new paradigm, and then we begin rebuilding.
As a student of history, I appreciate the changes and evolution that many of our mental models and scientific models have gone through. Changing mental models is what some of my astronomy students do in a lab called “The Checkerboard Universe.”
Students begin by writing a paragraph about their understanding of how scientists develop hypotheses, test them and come up with theories. Then they take turns determining specific rules about different patterns of the checkers on the board. After using their checkerboards, students reread their first paragraphs and then write another about their new or confirmed perspective of the role of the scientists.
Here are a couple of student comments from just this week:
• “I learned that you may not even have a question when you begin an experiment, but then you may stumble upon a question once an experiment has begun.”
• “When scientists fail they actually come closer to the answer.”
Our changing view of the universe is one reason I enjoy reading science writers such as Raymo, Sagan and Ferris. I think they give us science arguments in exciting, wondrous story forms.
Barbara, a professor of logic and philosophy, teaches that an argument is a group of propositions one of which is allegedly proven true by the others. I think this is what interesting science writers, these storytellers do. They describe the technological developments and the paradigm shifts. They describe our changing view of the universe around us. Maybe we should all think about becoming better “story tellers” of science.
#
Sunday, January 24, 2010
How do we know the Earth’s axis is tilted 23.5 degrees?
Imagine you have observed that on one particular day the sun at its highest point in the sky (local noon) is actually low above the southern horizon. Some days later, you notice that the noon-sun is higher, 23.5 degrees higher in the sky than it was for your first observation. Again, days pass and you notice at noon that the sun is even higher than before, another 23.5 degrees higher!
What is making this happen? Why is the sun changing its position in our sky?
Some ideas might be mystical: maybe angels and demons are fighting over the sun, holding their own celestial rugby match.
Some ideas might be more material: maybe the Earth is wildly wobbling on its axis.
A radical idea may be that the Earth is tilted: maybe our rotational axis is not exactly perpendicular to the orbital plane of the earth around the sun.
Is there a test we can conduct to see if the Earth may be wildly wobbling on its axis? Since we’re studying celestial objects oft times we must wait for the universe to do the testing for us and we just observe. Over time we notice that the changes in the position of the sun in our sky happen slowly and consistently.
Around December 21, the noon-sun is the lowest that it’s going to get. Just 3 months later, around March 21, the noon-sun position is 23.5 degrees higher than it was in December. Another 3 months (June 21) and the noon-sun is another 23.5 degrees higher. Again, another 3 months and the noon-sun has returned to it’s mid-position. And then it repeats, over and over.
Researching astronomical records you find the same pattern described far into recorded history. Would these observations rule-out the hypothesis that the Earth is wildly wobbling? The regularity of year after year, century after century, would seem to tell us the movement is not wild.
You start noticing other aspects of the sky, both during the days and the nights. You may notice that the star called Polaris stays pretty much in the same spot of the sky, night after night, year after year. If you travel to the North Pole you may find that on June 21, the noon-sun stays 23.5 degrees above the horizon all day. Another 3 months later and the noon-Sun barely brightens the horizon. Then the North Pole sky is dark for 6 months, but eventually, on March 21, the sun begins to reappear.
Would those observations lead the discerning observer to the conclusion that the Earth’s axis is tilted 23.5 degrees? We didn’t disprove the angelic rugby match!
I’m reading Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science, edited by L. B. Flick and N. G. Lederman, and I’m exploring this way of thinking about astronomy.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
School Has Begun
On the first day of class I have the students pair off and interview one another. One question they consider is what they want to learn about astronomy during our time together.
Most of my students are second semester non-science-major freshmen. Some take the class just to earn a lab credit or a science credit. Very few have any background experience in astronomy.
Here's the breakdown of responses in my Tuesday class:
want to learn about stars: 6 responses
want to learn constellations: 4 responses
want to learn about planets: 2 responses
want to learn about the universe: 1 response
want to learn about black holes: 1 response
want to learn about astrology: 1 response
want to learn about 2012 and the end of the world: 1 response
Several responses were very general interest in science or astronomy, and some did not address this question at all.
The request to learn about 2012 actually spurred one other student into a recount of her research and her conclusion that the whole "end of the world" hype is just "stupid."
Sunday, January 10, 2010
My path
Today at Church our minister and a dear friend shared the pulpit to speak of their paths to inner peace. One word my friend used struck a chord with me. That word is responsibility or "response-ability." We do have the ability to be in charge of our responses to others and the world around us. "Response-ability."
The minister shared a message about creating a beautiful quilt out of the many scraps life sometimes hands us. How do we make that quilt, travel that path, and be more in touch with the intimate (to learn how to communicate from the heart) and the ultimate (to touch that which is bigger than ourselves)? The answer is simple: with practice. Some practices are meditation, prayer, cooking, gardening, and there are many more.
That led me to think of my practices, how I'm responsible for traveling down the path to spiritual growth (intimacy and ultimacy.) Riding the motorcycle, painting the house, teaching, these to me are almost Zen-like activities. During these activities, I go into a different state of mind, (most of the time) to focus on doing that activity well and not getting distracted by the worries and burdens of everyday life.
I feel these practices have been somewhat successful in helping me sometimes achieve inner peace. I've rarely given them much thought, so now I am aware of them and their possible meaning for me spiritually. I wonder if knowing them in this way, being a little more observant about their place in my life, will change their effect?
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
The planet formerly known as Red
The fourth rock from the Sun has been rising earlier and earlier, making it a wonderful sight early at night.T here is was, rising in the East a couple nights ago them setting in the West when I went out early to get the paper the next morning.
Will humans ever get to Mars? Will I live long enough to see it happen?
There are so many obstacles to human presence on Mars. From political and economic here at home, to a lethal environment in the deep reaches of interplanetary space, we humans have quite a challenge facing us.
I rather hoped and believed we would have permanent outposts on the Moon by 2001, just the way Stanley Kubrick presented it back in the 60's. We haven't done too bad, though.
Our robotic explorers have visited many corners of our solar system and peered into far distances of the universe. We are receiving great pictures and wonderful clues from Mars from the rovers Spirit and Opportunity.
But the human presence is missing and that saddens me.
Monday, January 4, 2010
2010
I don't say those dates as "one thousand nine hundred fifty-one" or "one thousand nine hundred seventy-two."
So consistency seems to lead me to call this year "twenty-ten" instead of "two thousand-ten."
At the same time, I'm trying to develop more of a scientific attitude, one that does not embrace tradition merely for the sake of comfort. Maybe we'll talk about the status of the dwarf planet Pluto one day, but today I'm interested in the consistency and tradition of saying the date as "nineteen something" instead of "one thousand nine hundred something."
I'm also interested in doing the work I want to do while expending the least amount of energy. So I counted syllables.
"Twenty-ten" has three syllables and "two thousand ten" has four syllables.
In the interest of efficiency and the knowledge that I'll be somewhat consistent, I'll be calling this year "twenty-ten."
Now, I wonder, all the energy I am going to save by being so efficient, was that just used up with all this rationalization?